![]() Needless to say, Alpine were not best pleased and intended to take legal action as soon as they knew what was going on, and it later transpired that a few weeks earlier on July 4, Piastri and manager Mark Webber penned a contract with McLaren to join them from 2023. How could he not be driving at Alpine? He’s their reserve driver, has been a part of their junior ranks and, based on how the 2022 season is panning out, is probably the best seat available to him for 2023.īesides, other rival teams don’t even have seats available… What happened between Oscar Piastri and McLaren? I will not be driving for Alpine next year.” This is wrong and I have not signed a contract with Alpine for 2023. Within a day of Alonso confirming his departure to Aston Martin, which had already caught Alpine somewhat off-guard, they used their ready-made contingency plan and announced on August 2, 2022, that Alpine Academy driver Oscar Piastri would step up to Formula to take Alonso’s place.Īlonso has a seat, Piastri has a seat after a year on the sidelines following back-to-back F3 and F2 titles, so all is well, right?Īt 7pm BST, Twitter lit up when Piastri posted the now-infamous words: “I understand that, without my agreement, Alpine F1 have put out a press release late this afternoon that I am driving for them next year. ![]() The good news from Alpine’s perspective was that they had the reigning Formula 2 champion, Oscar Piastri, ready and waiting in the wings to step up… The Oscar Piastri tweet that sent Alpine, and F1 fans, into a tailspin The first twist in the tale came shortly afterwards, when Fernando Alonso, as he often has in the past, announced a shock move from Alpine to Aston Martin. Sure enough, a few hours later, a video emerged from the four-time World Champion on his new Instagram account announcing his retirement from Formula 1 at the end of 2022, and silly season was officially underway. In April this year, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals had upheld a previous ruling that said that Apple's policies did in fact breach California's competition laws by forcing users to only use its payment platform to process purchases inside apps available on the App Store.We should have known as soon as the famously private Sebastian Vettel joined social media that something was up. Essentially, the video game publisher wished that its users should be able to invest in in-game assets via online payment apps that are not linked to the Apple ecosystem, thus circumnavigating the steep 30 percent cut Apple collects on all purchases. ![]() In its plea, Epic Games had requested the US Supreme Court to lift a decision by the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals that effectively delayed implementing an injunction issued by US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers barring certain App Store rules. typically they require a 30% tax on all financial transactions, but bc that's impossible with crypto the way it is, they just ban the apps that have direct links/usage to swapping and trading.- Caleeeb August 7, 2023 Since the digital assets sector carries along an infamous reputation of being volatile, Apple maintains strict rules on the platform to safeguard iOS users from exposing themselves to the financial risks posed by virtual assets like cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs).Īpple has REALLY tight rules regarding any app that is used on their devices. The decision comes as a setback for Epic Games, publishers of popular Battle Royale video game Fortnite, and Web3 app developers who await changes in Apple's App Store policies.Īpple only processes purchases and in-app transactions for App Store-listed apps via Apple Pay, which not only restricts users to make these purchases in fiat currencies, but also levies a 30 percent commission fee on overall transactions.Īpple's AppStore policies have time and again been called out for supressing Web3 players. The court's ruling lets Apple keep its strict App Store payment rules in place for now. The court declined to let a federal judge's injunction take effect that could force the iPhone maker to change payment practices in its lucrative App Store. The US Supreme Court on Wednesday denied Epic Games' stringent App Store payment rules that prevent developers from introducing alternate payment methods for in-app purchases.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |